‘A Chilling Effect on U.S. Counterterrorism’

Last week, PG stated unequivocally that the release of the so called “torture memos” have “damaged the country.”  There is no question that Obama will be walking a tight rope with no net on this issue.  PG correctly pointed out that Obama has backpedaled on his commitment to not prosecute over the matter, demoralized the intelligence community, polarized the country, and emboldened our enemies. 

Not to be outdone, resident naysayer and thorn-in-the-side of conservatives, Phoenecian (Phooey), challenged PG to come up with evidence that supported PG’s assertion that the intelligence community was “demoralized.”  The exchange proceeded as such:

Phooey: Cite your sources, please.  (Hint hint: anecdotes are not data)

PG:  dude, should I just give a bad link like you do, with demonstrably misleading information, or should I provide real support?  Here is one Phooey…  *PG then went on to post two more

Phooey: Hint hint: anecdotes are not data.     Also hint hint – the directors do not always speak for the workers.

PG: What part of its “my observation of the available comments” do you not understand son. I gave you some of those comments. If you fail grasp that I can not help you. If you disagree with that then that’s fine with me Phooey. If you can find comments contrary to my position then more the better. If you find my argument unsupported that is all cake to me.

Well, unfortunately for the United States, it appears that PG actually knows what he is talking about.  Global Intelligence think tank Stratfor writers Fred Burton and Scott Stewart had this to say about the topic:

Politics and moral arguments aside, the end effect of the memos’ release is that people who have put their lives on the line in U.S. counterterrorism efforts are now uncertain of whether they should be making that sacrifice. Many of these people are now questioning whether the administration that happens to be in power at any given time will recognize the fact that they were carrying out lawful orders under a previous administration. It is hard to retain officers and attract quality recruits in this kind of environment. It has become safer to work in programs other than counterterrorism.

The memos’ release will not have a catastrophic effect on U.S. counterterrorism efforts. Indeed, most of the information in the memos was leaked to the press years ago and has long been public knowledge. However, when the release of the memos is examined in a wider context, and combined with a few other dynamics, it appears that the U.S. counterterrorism community is quietly slipping back into an atmosphere of risk-aversion and malaise — an atmosphere not dissimilar to that described by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also known as the 9/11 Commission) as a contributing factor to the intelligence failures that led to the 9/11 attacks.

If you care about our counterterrorism efforts, you must read the entire link.  It is a fascinating, non-partisan look at how legal and political considerations may be trumping our ability to effectively fight terror abroad.

Advertisement

Posted on April 30, 2009, in Blogging, Military issues, Politics, The Global War on Islamofascism, The Obama Administration, War on Terror. Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.

  1. Phoenician in a time of Romans

    “Many of these people are now questioning whether the administration that happens to be in power at any given time will recognize the fact that they were carrying out lawful orders under a previous administration. ”

    Oh, there’s a whopping great assumption there…

  2. If they are worried in terms of, “I don’t know whether we should even bother to try and get information from this prisoner we’ve held for six months”< then I really don’t care. Seriously! There are rules and regulations in place protecting people who do this in the name of an emergency situation.

    But good Lord, isn’t it clear that there is a good reason why these people would be continuing to say things like this? In other news, Rod Blagojevitch says that his prosecution will mean terrible things for the future of American Democracy, the head of Goldman Sachs is concerned that regulation of bank practices could cause a lack of growth, and Kevin Costner thinks that Mr. Brooks was an overlooked gem. They have to put out crap like this to make it easy for Congressional leaders to find reasons not to investigate.

    I mean, Jesus, this is the CIA. They are paid and trained to engage in psychological manipulation, propaganda and knowing what buttons to press to get things done without anyone being able to tell. Why are we talking about them like they’re poor, defenseless victims of manipulation on the part of OBAMA? It was likely some members of the CIA that began the effort to put this information in the public eye, and it’s some other members that are trying to prevent it.

  3. Phooey and Wes didn’t read the link. This discussion will have to take place between the grown ups on the site.

  4. Are you talking about the article you linked to or an article I don’t know about? Because the one above did nothing to disprove the idea that this is just a bunch of CIA agents encouraged to engage in unusually lawless activity that are now hoping to ensure they never get named.

    *** REDACTED SNARKY DICKISH COMMENT ***

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 322 other followers