White House Insider: “The President Is Losing It”
Q: But would another four years of an Obama presidency be the best thing for America?
A: (Long pause) Now that is a much more interesting question right there, and a question I think more and more Democrat Party insiders are asking themselves these days, myself included. I am going to come right out and say it – No. Obama is not up to the job of being president. He simply doesn’t seem to care about the work involved. You want to know what? Obama is lazy. He really is. And it is getting worse and worse. Would another four years of Obama be the best thing for America? No it would not. What this country needs is a president who is focused on the job more than on themselves. Obama is not that individual.
And part two is even worse. In part one, the Insider’s tone was regretful. Part two, the second interview, has him furious:
I had such great hopes for President Obama. Those hopes have been crushed. It wasn’t an easy thing to see. On the campaign, the guy was so good. Brilliant. …Then I think to how fast it all went wrong, how soon we all started to see that there was so little to the man. We got caught up in the moment, and forgot to consider the consequences of electing someone who was simply not prepared to be President. We screwed up. I guess in a way, these interviews I am giving you are a way to…make up for that. At least in some little way.
Is this guy for real? Some of the commenters think he is and this guy makes a good case:
If this is true, I want to guess who this insider is:
It’s Rahm Emanuel!
In Part 1, he mentions that he is involved in a campaign whose election day is soon after November. Rahm is running for mayor of Chicago.
He said that he has personally witnessed Obama’s bad behavior.
He cusses several times in the interview. He also tells the interviewer “I am writing the script” of this scandal.
It makes sense that he’d abandon ship while he still could. Then when the boom is lowered, he is out of the line of fire.
We may have the chance to see if the Insider is real. He says a major scandal is brewing at the White House:
Q: In your email to me last week, you indicated a scandal was coming to the White House. Could you elaborate a bit more on that now?A: Sadly, with this White House it is no longer a matter of a scandal, but of scandals. I see you did a story recently on the Justice Department situation surrounding the voting rights case. Continue watching that – it’s going to break open more soon after Republicans take the House. As you stated, it’s going to be investigated.
Q: Just tell me about this scandal.
A: (Leans back, folds arms across chest. Looks outside – then back to me) Ok then – I’ll point your nose in the right direction. Enough people are sniffing in the same garbage pile anyways, including the Times. Though I suspect they are burying it at the moment, or trying to. They are still heavily invested in Obama, but that may change soon… Go back to Chicago. That is the key. There is other crap around the White House, other things that could trip them up, but Chicago is where the real heavy deal is that could bring the administration down. Go back and review Blagojevich. Go back and review Rezko, Barton, Stern, Giordano, Carothers, Jarret. It’s one and the same. It’s all connected, and it’s big. And people know. The White House is -expletive- itself over this stuff. Pelosi has it. Clintons have it – more of it than they had in 2008.
Posted on October 31, 2010, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.
The Sage
Steve
E the Wise
DFV the Scribe
hairybeast
Mo K.
Sting the Away
Rudy
Voice of Reason
Anthony Rogers
Vérité
Isaiah's Cry
danagall
Hal Jordan
The Rat
Aquinas Shrugged
jackcurtis
a west texas view
pino
Cultural Limits
Regalo Di Spine
Tokyo Tengu
Short Little Rebel
AWOL Civilization
SeePamBlog
rogueoperator
provider4many
jimmullen1
thomaspaine2nd
badoracle
ljponders
weeicemon
Daniella Nicole
plainansimple
Definitely has the air of truth about it. And some of these assertions I have seen before in other publications by other people which only seems to verify what we see here.
I’LL MAKE IT SHORT & SWEET . ALL HELL IS GOING TO BREAK OUT NEXT YEAR WITH ALL OF HIS CROOKED ADMINISTRATION . FOR TRYING TO RUIN OUR COUNTRY AND MAKING IT INTO SOCIALISM. I HOPE THEY INVESTIGATE HIS BIRTHER AND PUT AN END TO THIS CRAP .
THEY SHOULD ALL BE FOUND GUILTY AND PUT AWAY FOR LIFE . SO THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN AGAIN .
Dear JA,
The problem is that there is an almost limitless supply of unscrupulous crooks waiting in the wings. Throwing a group of politicians in jail is a short-term solution. Many of Nixon’s boys went to jail and emerged as talk radio hosts or ministry leaders.
What America seems to really need is a way to establish direct accountability to the constituency without encouraging mob rule. The tech revolution hints at MANY possible solutions. One thing I’d favor is rapid recall votes or votes of no confidence, but not with finality. The citizenry needs to be able to initiate all manner of things, but a retarding function must be in place such as the courts, a general election, or perhaps allowing politicians who receive public censure to be subject to short-term suspension periods which would function much like restraining orders. A quorum of the electorate, acting much like a jury, should be empowered to immediately tie the hands of suspected abusive politicians pending further investigation, legal prosecution or emergency elections as befits the circumstances. Such a remedy would be great for addressing voter fraud, kickbacks, and DOJ inquiries because it would allow the people to say yea or nea concerning a politician continuing to govern prior to the final outcome. The downside, an it’s a big one, is that such methods could be abused to prevent clean people from effectively governing. Therefore, to my mind, the quorum of voters would have to be large–say 60 to 75% of the registered voters–to assure that a system like this doesn’t become a tool for playing politics.
Regarding BHO being foreign-born. I have no doubt he was born in Kenya. My gut feeling is that most presidents in the past 70 years have routinely violated the Constitution. So he’s not unusual as much as an extreme case. As for making the country socialist, I believe that’s been happening since the early 1900s with media and academia–and the lackadaisical electorate they’ve cultivated–being far more to blame than any particular politician.