Obama’s Own Defense Secretary Says Military Cuts Will Create Risks

PANETTA SAYS CUTS WILL HURT ‘AMERICA’S CAPABILITY TO RESPOND’ TO THREATS

Politics? Nope. Feisty rhetoric from a Republican presidential candidates debate? Uh uh. Admissions from Barack Obama’s own Secretary of Defense? Yep.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said today that the cuts in defense proposed by Mr. Obama will create “risks” in America’s “capability to respond” to threats.

“The risks come with the fact that, you know, we will have a smaller force,” Panetta said at a Pentagon briefing: “As we said, it’s larger than we had prior to 9/11, but obviously it will be a smaller force, and when you have a smaller force there are risks associated with that in terms of our capability to respond.”

WTF?

Worse? Army General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, echoed Panetta’s assessment, pointing out that once the Regime’s cuts in defense are implemented, there will be risk that the U.S. military will not be able to respond as quickly as it now can.

“The primary risks lie not in what we can do, but in how much we can do and how fast we can do it,” said Dempsey: “The risks therefore, are in terms of time and capacity.”

Incredibly, Panetta conceded that the United States still faces “a number of very important threats in the world,” such as turmoil in the Middle East, the proliferation of nuclear weapons, Iran, North Korea and cyber warfare, but hey – we have class warfare to fight, right?

For Fiscal Year 2013, the Obama Regime will request $525 billion for the U.S. military’s base budget, which is down from $531 billion in FY 2012.

Priorities, America; wealth redistribution is an expensive proposition.

^

Dark days, folks, dark days.

Advertisement

Posted on January 27, 2012, in 2012 Presidential Election, Barack Obama, Defense Budget, Military Spending, Planet Obama, You Can't Make this Stuff up, You’re kidding right? and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. Well, now that Congress has assigned the Pentagon the job of policing the citizens, rounding up and imprisoning any it’s displeased with, “THREAT” takes on a new identity, right?

    Other than citizens, who is a real military threat to the U.S? Such as North Korea and Iran will not be deterred by a big military any more than was al-Qaeda.

    We need a huge military only to throw our weight around the world…and we aren’t doing too well at that now, are we?

    But all that’s beside the real point nobody wants to face: WE AIN’T GOT THE MONEY!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 322 other followers