Author Archives: Anthony Rogers

Mark Levin takes on the haters

People are talking a lot right now that the vitriol needs to be leveled down a lot.  Problem is there are too many people that thrive on it.  To me journalism hit the current low when Keith Olbermann went on MSNBC.  I think he’s the worst editorialist in the world.  The reason, well, just look:

His stuff is only partisan, is only personal, and is only inflammatory.  When faced with a situation where he has no facts to support his argument, he resorts to mocking and trivializing the object of his scorn.  At the very best he sounds immature.  At the worst, not someone you want your kids around.  He’s thrived on MSNBC even though I think most of his content borders on slander.  Let’s look at slander a little closer, shall we?
Read the rest of this entry

Defund NPR now

Recently was sent this link:

townhall_NPR

That’s my image, here’s Townhall’s link.  Since I was a young boy, I hated NPR.  They’ve had a lifelong history of dumbing down content.  If they were reporting a war, you heard incessant gun fire in the background.  The noises alone drove me away.  It just struck me that they thought the average listener was too stupid to know what war was, so they tossed in sound effects to help.  The content never enticed me to stay.  Once CNN, Fox, MSNBC, XM, Cable, radio, the internet, and a host of other outlets arose to fill their void, I forgot they even existed.  They served no function in my life.  And, from what I can gather, the same was true for most of the US.
Read the rest of this entry

Moveon gets stomped on

A lot has been made of the video where a woman gets her head stomped on at a Rand Paul/Jack Conway debate.

A lot.  Before rushing to judgment, and before making incendiary comments in my presence, take into consideration some facts first.

Her original story was she was simply handing Rand Paul an employee of the month award for a fictional company moveon.org made up.  What is that supposed to mean to Rand Paul?  Then, it was she was simply wanting to hold a sign.  In all her versions, she’s just innocently standing there and gets jumped.  That’s Keith Olbermann’s take too.  Here’s the same incident from a different angle:

And here’s a slightly different angle too:

So, ya gotta ask yourself, if you could care less about knowing the truth, what a woman from Massachusetts, who works for a group that funds the opposing party against Rand Paul, was doing standing in the middle of a Rand Paul crowd and attacking his car?  I mean, last I recall, people in Massachusetts aren’t allowed to vote for Kentucky candidates.  So, this paid political activist wearing a wig and a hoodie then attacks Paul’s car and is taken down by two guys, one of whom restrains her with her foot.

She was wanting to create a scene.  And she did.  And Keith Olbermann was more than ready to feed it to the masses.  She’ll now go back to Massachusetts and plot her next political ploy I’m sure.

Doubt me still?  After the event Ilyse Hogue informs the media that Valle was in the hospital receiving treatment and wasn’t sure when she would be able to talk to the media.  At the same time, Valle is still at the event smiling and giving interviews for the media.  Why should anyone care?  Ilyse Hogue is moveon.org’s political director.  She’s lying too.  She’s not from Kentucky either.

All you peeps who immediately condemned the Rand Paul peeps have been lied to and taken for a ride.  You have been fooled.  That’s what moveon.org does.  This ain’t Greenpeace or some environmental activist group, this is Moveon.org., a purely political entity that supports Democrats any way they see fit and have been primarily funded by George Soros, a Hungarian who made his money in Russia and nearly destroyed the British economy.

That’s a whole lot of people that have nothing to do with Kentucky that are making an awful big scene trying to affect who we in Kentucky elect.  That’s just not right either.

The rebel in me wants to say that when pushy people come down from the North to try and tell us what to do, they might get their heads stomped on.  But, God knows that is so horribly politically incorrect so I probably shouldn’t say it that way.

But……

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Paul Krugman is still an idiot

Some people are just unlearned.  Some people are just stubborn.  Some people are just stupid.  Some people just can’t quit lying.  Paul Krugman has to be the latter.  His argument for why we should still vote Democrat in spite of the fact their economic policies to date have failed miserably is because we shouldn’t return to the prosperity that got us into this mess.  Yeah, you heard me right.  In spite of all the force-fed propaganda, what Paul Krugman et al are telling you are lies that they know, or would have to know, are lies.  Paul Krugman was there in 1999 and 2000.  I bet when he’s drunk out of his mind he still laughs about the “Dot-com bubble” that burst and sent the country into a perilous not-quite recession but pretty bad economic mess.  For those of us who are not Princeton educated economists, we have to read Wikipedia to remind ourselves of it.  Heck, Wiki even has a specific date it burst, March 10, 2000.  With the exploding markets, President Clinton’s Federal Reserve raised interest rates six times doing everything it could to suck the life out of the “irrational exuberance”.  BY March 10, 2000, they succeeded and the markets started receding, soon to be an all-out collapse.  Throughout 2000 the headlines were marked by huge dot-com successes filing for bankruptcy.  They in turn took out other industry giants such as communications and manufacturing.  The corporate graveyard was astounding in 2000.  Then, the NEXT YEAR, President Bush took office.  So, all this BS that things were so fantastic when Bush took office is just flat out lies. Krugman was there.  He knows what happened.  Is that what he thinks we need to return to?

Bush inherited a mess, and it only got worse.  Shortly after he took office, 9/11 occurred.  That created a mess on it’s own.  However, starting pretty much to that day, with the assist of the “Bush tax cuts for the wealthy”, the country kicked into one of the longest sustained growths in the country’s history.  It wasn’t crazy irrational growth, it was average, and steady.  There was no inflation, and unemployment stayed fairly steady.  In 2006 the country focused more on perceived personal misfortunes than the economy and voted the Republicans out of control.  Almost on cue, the economy tanked.  Now, Paul Krugman knows this.  He knows who controls the spending budgets.  He knows who controls the Fed rate policies.  He knows just as well as you and I do that when Nancy Pelosi’s economic policies started hitting the markets, they killed it.  Bush wasn’t the one who proposed TARP, he merely did not interfere with Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.  They wrote it, the Democrats passed it.  The economy tanked.  Then Obama got his shot at the whole mess.  It tanked even worse.

So, what Krugman is telling us is that we need to return to the days when  undocumented book values were taxed at outrageous levels regardless of whether they were real or not.  That successful people should be taxed at somewhere around 60%.  That the federal government should turn its head completely when companies make outrageous leaps in book value with no revenues to speak of.  That banks would leverage completely fictional values against revenues a company never had.  That home values would be allowed to explode for no apparent reason.  And, of course, that it’s the Republicans that are sold out to big business that allowed this to happen while the not-really-Communist Democrats are protecting the little union guy.

None of that makes sense.  No one calls Krugman on any of it.  So, him and the New York Times and most other media just keep on repeating it over and over to saturate the internet so it appears that it has to be real.

Apparently the average American voter just isn’t that stupid.  Do you remember 2000? Yes we can!  Do you remember 2007?  Yes we can!

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Harry Reid saves the world

Not sure if this has been covered here yet or not.  If it has, a laugh is always worth repeating!

I don’t think anyone ever assumed Harry Reid is a modest man.  But, he recently had this to offer:

‘You know, but for me we’d be in a worldwide depression.’ They want to know what I have done for them.”

Just curious:

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Joshua Komisarjevsky and Steven J Hayes

These guys just need killing in the worst possible way.  Right now.

There is no doubt whatsoever that they killed an entire family brutally.  None.  They’re even admitting it now in way too much detail.  There is no point whatsoever in having a trial that lasts more than five minutes to announce how guilty they are.  How long will we be forced to suffer the details?  These guys just need killing now, and the evidence destroyed immediately.  I don’t care which one is more guilty than the other, they both did it, neither tried to stop it.  They are both equally at fault.  They both need to be removed from society, and most definitely from the gene pool.  And quite frankly, the most humane methods need to be eliminated.  Slowly cooked over an open fire would suit me just fine.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

This is getting nuttier every day. In 1993, when the Democrats controlled everything in DC, they passed a piece of legislation that pretty much everyone hated. It was affectionately referred to as the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994“. Now, a lot of people don’t keep track of things like they should so I’ll remind everyone how the Senate voted:

Akaka (D-HI), Yea
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Bingaman (D-NM), Yea
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Boren (D-OK), Yea
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Bradley (D-NJ), Yea
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Brown (R-CO), Nay
Bryan (D-NV), Yea
Bumpers (D-AR), Yea
Burns (R-MT), Yea
Byrd (D-WV), Yea
Campbell (D-CO), Yea
Chafee (R-RI), Yea
Coats (R-IN), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Cohen (R-ME), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Coverdell (R-GA), Nay
Craig (R-ID), Yea
D’Amato (R-NY), Nay
Danforth (R-MO), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
DeConcini (D-AZ), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Yea

Dole (R-KS), Nay
Domenici (R-NM), Nay
Dorgan (D-ND), Not Voting
Durenberger (R-MN), Yea
Exon (D-NE), Yea
Faircloth (R-NC), Yea
Feingold (D-WI), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Ford (D-KY), Yea
Glenn (D-OH), Yea
Gorton (R-WA), Nay
Graham (D-FL), Yea
Gramm (R-TX), Nay
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Nay
Hatfield (R-OR), Nay
Heflin (D-AL), Yea
Helms (R-NC), Nay
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Yea
Jeffords (R-VT), Yea
Johnston (D-LA), Yea
Kassebaum (R-KS), Yea
Kempthorne (R-ID), Yea
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Kerrey (D-NE), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Yea
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Mack (R-FL), Nay
Mathews (D-TN), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Nay
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Metzenbaum (D-OH), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Mitchell (D-ME), Yea
Moseley-Braun (D-IL), Yea
Moynihan (D-NY), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Nay
Nunn (D-GA), Yea
Packwood (R-OR), Nay
Pell (D-RI), Yea
Pressler (R-SD), Nay
Pryor (D-AR), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Riegle (D-MI), Yea
Robb (D-VA), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Roth (R-DE), Nay
Sarbanes (D-MD), Yea
Sasser (D-TN), Yea
Shelby (D-AL), Yea
Simon (D-IL), Yea
Simpson (R-WY), Yea
Smith (R-NH), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Nay
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Thurmond (R-SC), Yea
Wallop (R-WY), Nay
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Nay
Wofford (D-PA), Yea

I hilite the “yea””s for a reason. Wannna guess what it is? OK, I’ll give one clue. Democrats passed this thing 51-12. Without one single Republican needing to vote, they passed it. The military didn’t like it, the gay community didn’t like it, no one liked it. The Democrat controlled House, the Democrat controlled Senate, and the Democrat President rammed it through anyway. According to Clinton, it wasn’t perfect, but it was a start. Media pretty much ignored “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” for a while until it became expedient. Over time, it became purely a Republican issue as the Republicans did exactly as the Democrats did years before and effectively ignored it. The media bias culminated itself this year when Lady Gaga chastised Republicans for talking about filibustering the bill that would eliminate Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell:
http://abcnews.go.com/assets/player/walt2.6/flash/SFP_Walt.swf

“I will not stop calling until I reach them to tell them to vote with Sen. Harry Reid to end John McCain’s ‘shameless filibuster,’” she said.

She then calls two Democrats who refuse to take her call. There was no filibuster, Harry Reid never sent it to the floor. The gays returned to attacking the hell out of Republicans only even though the Democrats once again had all the votes they needed to pass the legislation to end it. All the while, no one was mentioning the fact that a lawsuit was working it’s way through the legal system to undo what Bill Clinton and the Democrats did in 1993. It wasn’t filed by Lady Gaga. It wasn’t filed by any Democrat. It was filed by the Log Cabin Republicans. And then a weird thing happened. They won. Republicans, who controlled nothing in DC, did what Harry Reid refused to do. They ended “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. The Obama administration thought about it for a couple of days. And, knowing how the gays felt about DADT, had this to offer:

WASHINGTON — After two days of silence, the Obama administration urged a federal judge on Thursday to let the military press on with its “don’t ask, don’t tell” ban on gays serving openly in the military. Still, President Barack Obama insisted the policy that has divided the nation for two decades “will end on my watch.”

The Pentagon said the military “will of course obey the law” and halt enforcement while the case is still in question. But gay rights advocates cautioned gay service members to avoid revealing their sexuality in the meantime.

A federal judge abruptly threw out the Clinton-era ban on Tuesday, setting in motion a legal, political and human-rights back-and-forth that put the administration on the spot just two weeks before crucial midterm elections. Obama has consistently argued against the ban, approved by Congress in 1993. But he says it is up to Congress to repeal it.

The policy, summed up as “don’t ask, don’t tell,” refers to guidance that gay or lesbian Americans can serve in the military but not openly. Their superiors are forbidden to ask about sexual orientation, but service members can be thrown out or denied enlistment if they talk about being gay or let it be known that they engage in homosexual acts.

Obama’s Justice Department asked U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips to stay her ruling that overturned the ban while the government prepares a formal appeal. Asking the judge for a response by Monday – “given the urgency and gravity of the issues” – the government said that suddenly ending the ban would be disruptive and “irreparably harm the public interest in a strong and effective military.”

Obama, challenged Thursday at a town hall meeting by a Howard University faculty member who questioned his “alleged commitment to equality for all Americans, gay and straight,” said his stance has not wavered. He can’t end the ban with the stroke of a pen, he said, but “we’re going to end this policy.”

You read that right. The Obama Administration is asking for a delay in the ruling so the Obama Administration can prepare an appeal to the ruling. They wanna fight it. So, even though the Democrats wrote DADT, passed DADT, have ruled over DADT for nine of the seventeen years it’s been existance, refused to vote to end DADT, and now are fighting legally to keep DADT, I bet you good money there won’t be a single liberal gay person come out and point their finger where the problem is, has been, and continues to be. If they do, I’d love to see their comments here. The reason DADT has survived all these years considering no one seems to like it is because the Democrats know they won’t be held accountable for it so no need to antagonize their moderate to conservative base, and the Republicans know that no matter what they do they won’t get any credit so they have no reason to antagonize their base either. When media and gays become less partisan and more objective then maybe they’ll get what they want.

Until then, they’ll have to keep relying on the Republicans. It’s a core issue with Republicans in a way most people don’t really think about. In expecting the government to protect a minority, the government has to do it in a way that is equitable to all people affected by the minority. Sometimes that doesn’t necessarily work to the minority’s advantage. By NOT recognizing the minority as a minority, it removes the issue of being a minority and allows the issues that affect that minority to be addressed. There is no reason to protect gays in the military. They are already protected by our Constitution. What needs to be protected are the rights gays have as US citizens. When that occurs, gays will have all the same rights as anyone else in the military and I am quite sure that would make everyone happy. Repealing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell therefore is kind of moot to me. What needs to happen is all references to discriminating on the basis of sexual preferance need to be eliminated. I really don’t buy the argument that it would be disruptive to the military at all. Obama may want you to believe that, but I don’t.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Ben Chandler hammers Andy Barr’s criminal record

The Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee is hammering Andy Barr in Kentucky about as hard as you can:

You can’t trust Andy Barr for anything because he’s a criminal. Simple message. According to Bluegrass Politics it’s true too:

The ruling: True.

The facts: In 1993, as a 19-year-old college student vacationing in Key West, Fla., Barr was charged by police with possession of a fake Mississippi driver’s license. He pleaded guilty and was ordered to provide eight hours of community service, according to court records.

Their justification of why it’s true is that when he applied for state jobs he didn’t list that conviction. He felt it was “minor”. DCCC argues otherwise.

I think this is deceptive by Ben Chandler and the DCCC. What do you think?

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Whoopi on civility?

Whoopi Goldberg is now trying to make money bemoaning the loss of civility.

I kid you not.

She has written an entire book about it. Seriously, she has.

This of course came out right about the time she was telling basically everyone who had an opinion about the 9/11 Mosque to kiss her butt. And of course, her daily civil discourse usually sounds something like this:

Just a couple of suggestions on civility here would do. Firsties, don’t talk over people. Secondies, don’t interrupt others. Thirdly, comparing modern people to historic despots isn’t civil. Fourthly, lying about others isn’t civil either ( some would call it slander ).

I really think when she sets the bar a little higher she’ll have room to complain about others. Until then, just send me your $12.49. It’ll do a little more good for mankind than her hypocritical book.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

PS: Sorry so lazy lately, I had to take a sudden ocean cruise to Mexico for a week or so.

Whatever happened to the Summer of Recovery

Heh! Trick question of course. It was never meant for you if you weren’t a construction project:

“The vice president was talking about the summer of recovery in reference to the Recovery Act, that you would see the creation of a series of infrastructure and other projects ramping up over the summer,” Goolsbee said on “Fox News Sunday.” “And you did see that.”

Raise your hand out there, how many of you thought Joe Biden was promising jobs?

Maybe a little more looking is warranted:
Read the rest of this entry

Extending the Bush tax cuts

I’m still trying to figure this all out.

John Boehner said he might play nice with Obama and support whatever tax cuts Obama wants, since it’s better than nothing. Robert Gibbs immediately attacked Boehner pointing out it was the policies of the last eight years that got us in this mess now. That reflects what Obama said in Cleveland last week as well. So, now Boehner is being attacked for saying he will possibly support Obama. Which side is the “party of No”?
Read the rest of this entry

James Lee hearted Al Gore

James Lee was influenced by Al Gore. He believed An Inconvenient Truth was gospel. What else do I have to say?

Just a suggestion, only a suggestion, maybe Obama needs to direct his Homeland Security people to look in a different direction? The last two attacks certainly can’t be described as “right wing extremism”. Ya think Janet Napolitano’s making that argument to Obama right now? Do you really?

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

John Cusack’s insight

John Cusack has never been a particular favorite of mine.  Right behind Keanu Reeves’ stoic one-expression acting is John Cusack’s ability to stare straight ahead through an entire career of movies, he ranks as the second worst actor in Hollyowood.  He finally makes ONE movie I enjoy, mainly because he pulls off being a crackhead so well.  So, imagine my dismay when, after accepting him after twenty years of thinking he’s yet another brain-dead actor propped up by their family’s inside connections to Hollywood, he tweets this:

“I AM FOR A SATANIC DEATH CULT CENTER AT FOX NEWS HQ AND OUTSIDE THE OFFICES ORDICK ARMEYAND NEWT GINGRICH-and all the GOP WELFARE FREAKS,”

OK, I’m not really in the mood to debate Hollywood crackheads experiencing a meltdown, but I’ll give it my best shot:

John, step away from the crack, slowly.

OK, I’m done.

What exactly is one to debate?  That made absolutely no sense at all.  All it really does to me is reinforce my original assumption that he’s a talentless crackhead propped up by his family’s Hollywood connections.  And, when feeling threatened, he does what all liberals do, resort to name calling and insults rather than making even the remotest attempt at logically discussing the topic.

The only thing better than Cusack becoming completely unhinged was this:

“His provocative tweets could easily incite a rabid fan to commit violent acts against Fox News Headquarters and others he names,” said Dr. Carole Lieberman, a Beverly Hills-based psychiatrist and author of “Coping with Terrorism: Dreams Interrupted

I know she means well, but I don’t really think Cusack has any rabid fans.  Someone can prove me wrong if they want as that is purely a hunch on my part.  But, I’m guessing Fox, Dick Armey, and Newt are as safe now as they were before Cusack’s call to action to form a satanic death cult.

Also posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Dry run for terror?

Dutch Question 2 Men Arrested on Terror Suspicion on Flight From Chicago to Amsterdam

Dutch investigators on Tuesday questioned two Detroit-area men arrested at Amsterdam’s airport after U.S. authorities found suspicious items in their checked luggage, including a cell phone taped to a Pepto-Bismol bottle and a knife and box cutter.

The pair were arrested Monday morning at Schiphol Airport after getting off a United Airlines flight from Chicago, where their decision to change their flight plans raised flags in the U.S. that they were potentially assessing the aviation system for a potential future terror attack

They were being held at the airport for questioning, but neither has been charged with any offense in the Netherlands, said Martijn Boelhouwer, spokesman for the national prosecutor’s office. Under Dutch law, the men can be held without charges for up to six days.

Sources told Fox News that the men posed no immediate danger to the flight, but U.S. officials are looking into whether the men were “testing the system.”

Not sure who Fox’s “source” is, but they are dumber than mud and not to be considered a trustworthy “source”. My memory seems to be better than the “source”, follow the wavy lines:

Terrorists who hijacked American Airlines Flight 11 out of Boston this morning slit the throats of two female flight attendants who tried to bar them from entering the cockpit, an American Airlines employee told WorldNetDaily in an exclusive interview.

The terrorists then forced their way into the locked cockpit and commandeered the Boeing 767 to New York, where they slammed it into one of the World Trade Center towers. The flight, carrying 81 passengers, was bound for Los Angeles.

A third stewardess aboard the nine-crew flight – Madeline Amy Sweeney – used her cellphone, or possibly the plane phone, to alert Michael Woodward, her superviser back at Logan International Airport, about the hijacking and murders. The terrorists were armed with razor-tipped knives that looked like box cutters, she relayed.

OK, I’ll have to let someone else make the argument for needing a box cutter on an actual flight. I personally can’t think of one. Toss in the fact that one of the Al-whatevers is from Yemen flying all over the civilized world with lots of cash and pretend IED’s and I think you’ve got someone who really just needs to be locked up permanently or gotten rid of for eternity.

And once Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al Soofi and Hezam al Murisi have been given their martyrdom, that “source” needs to be taken as far away from airports as you can possibly get. When I fly I want someone who knows what a threat is and does something about it ASAP.

The story doesn’t read terribly clear but if they knew that these Muslems had box cutters before they got on the plane to fly to Amsterdam, I’d be suing the hell out of whoever made that decision to let them fly if I were on that flight. That’s just nuts. Spy on them later. Let them know getting on planes with box cutters isn’t tolerated now.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Vacationing in Mexico soon?

Headline reads:

Mayor of Violent Mexican Border State Assassinated

Which makes me gotta ask:

This kinda bugs me because if we can’t won’t control the border from people just walking in as they please, how can we stop if from people that have killed over 100 people in the last few weeks.

A matter of trust – CNN

This screen grab of CNN covering Glenn Beck’s Restoring Honor rally pretty much sums up the state of “professional” reporting these days.

Wanna count the errors?

  1. Happening Now is obviously not Sara Palin.
  2. It’s Sarah Palin, not Sara Palin.
  3. Sarah Palin was never a Presidential candidate, she was, of course, a Vice-Presidential candidate.

With so very little concern about getting the very obvious correct, ever wonder how much CNN gets right?

H/T: Doug Powers at Michelle Malkin.

That pesky 10,000 mark

A few months or so ago, Obama hit the beach and started delivering his “economy is recovering, but not enough” message.  Some think this was in response to the rather catastrophic forecast of the first Tuesday in November.  Personally, I do.  “It’s the economy, stupid.”  Simple message, hard to debate.  The message then was that the recovery was so obvious even his critics had to admit it.  He wouldn’t say who they were, but you know who they are because they would go home and take credit for the successes.  Well, as of today, it’s not being reflected on Wall Street.  That’s who Obama blames for all of our problems. 

When he gave that speech, the Dow had just topped 10,500.  As of today, it’s 9,985.  What’s scarier is some finance guys are forecasting 5,000 in less than two years.  I won’t rule them out.  I’m looking for that “critic” that has to admit that negative growth is an obvious sign of recovery. 

In the time he gave that speech, new housing permits have dropped from historic lows.  I don’t think anyone in housing construction is quite ready to admit that negative growth is an obvious sign of recorvery either.

In the time since he gave that speech, unemployment has dropped .2%.  However, employment has dropped precipitously as well.  It’s not that fewer are claiming unemployment benefits because they’re finding jobs, it’s that fewer people are even trying to at this point.  I don’t think too many critics will admit that fewer people working is an obvious sign of recovery either.

Quite frankly, the speech he made on May 18, 2010 claiming his critics were going home taking credit for the obvious recovery is just a flat out lie.  It looked bad then, it looks much worse now.  I’d shout out “You lie!”, but then I’d be called a racist.  So, I won’t.  I’ll just type it very quietly here.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

More people out of work while imports surge?

While employment still failed to gain any traction, businesses increased their inventories and invested in infrastructure. Usually when businesses invest heavily, you get employment. This time however, it all came from overseas by way of imports, which surged 28%.

The reason is simple, it’s so much cheaper to buy overseas than it is to try to manufacture this stuff here. And, with Obama making damn sure hiring people gets as expensive as he possibly can, it’s just going to get worse. There’s no law that tells businesses they have to buy domestic. Even with Obama’s Cash for Clunkers program, most of that money went to buy foreign made cars. Sure, some of them were manufactured in the United States, but a lot were not. And apparently a good deal of the current ARRA money is being sent out of the country. That just doesn’t really do us much good now does it? Borrowing money to give to other countries. Bad plan.

Rule #1: If you receive Recovery money, it has to stay here. That won’t solve the whole problem, but it will certainly mitigate the damage of these brain-dead stimulus programs.

And the next time Obama brags on the millions of jobs he saved, ask him which country they were in.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

That Bush wrecked the economy pushing two wars myth

The prevailing story that liberals have hung their hat on for the last couple of years is Obama can’t win because he was strung with funding two wars. No economy can sustain that. Case closed. Sounds simple enough. Numbers should back that one up, right?

Look close at that again. Make sense? Try again. Without going into a whole lot of detail, quite simply, in his first year, Barack Obama spent more on his stimulus than the entire Iraq War. The CBO puts the actual cost of the Iraqi war at $709 billion. Not the $3 trillion cited by Obama.

It’s not that he was slightly wrong on an estimate or anything, he was way off. No one has a clue where that number came from. That amounts to about $100 billion a year. To put it in perspective, his stimulus plans have accounted for about $800 billion. A year. All those wonderful things he could have done with that $3 trillion never would have existed. He lied to you.

To put it in proper perspective, his one year of stimulus cost us more than the entire eight years of the Iraq War. Raise your hands, how many people benefited from the stimulus? We could have benefitted probably, but his special interests got it first. I’m not in a union, it didn’t do squat for me.

If we couldn’t afford those wars, then it’s obvious we can’t afford Obama.

H/T: K2

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

That vast right-wing anti-mosque conspiracy

“There is no question there is a concerted effort to make this a political issue by some. And I join those who have called for looking into how is this opposition to the mosque being funded,”

In my case, unfortunately, it’s not been funded. 2/3′s of the country has issues with this project. That’s why Nancy Pelosi hears about it everywhere she goes. That very simple concept is well beyond her grasp apparently.

H/T: K2.

Also posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Obama supports the 911 Mosque

“As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country,”

“That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances,” he said. “This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable.”

There has to be someone out there who is surprised by this.  2 in 10 New Yorkers polled supported the idea of the Cordoba House.  73% of all polled opposed it.  Blacks, whites, males, females, latinos, you name it, they opposed it.  So, as usual, Obama disregards the will of the majority to assert a moral opinion that he has some special insight that 73% of the people don’t.  That the same funding mechanism and values that supported killing 3,000 innocent New Yorkers should be accepted by those victims simply because it was done in the name of religion.

Clue here Obama, there’s a bunch of New Yorkers who I don’t think are going to be very tolerant.  I don’t expect them to be.  A good portion of that religion has declared holy wars on the citizens of the United States.  Some people take that seriously. 

Others think they can talk their way out of it.

Side note, I’m going to bet this headline alone costs the Democrats 10 more elections.  The rap on Obama was he would be weak on defense.  The very day an aggressive Islamic nation announces they are going nuclear, Obama sells out New York City to Bin Laden.  We are pulling out of Iraq and Afghanistan and tossing in Manhatten to boot.  I would hope it would be a lot bigger number than 10, but some people just can’t vote anything but Democrat.

A Liberal bad day

It’s been a strange week. Not that any have been terribly normal since January 2009. First we had Howard Stern trashing Democrats:

To which Robert Gibbs suggested the “professional left” should be drug tested. Howard Stern on drugs? No way.

Also during this day of both Perseids AND a massive CME, Gibbs suggested those same “professional liberals” would only be happy with Dennis Kucinich. Am I supposed to think that’s merely a coincidence? I ain’t buying it.

And to top it all off, Charlie Rangel spent 37 minutes of Congress’s time belaboring everyone that he’s not a criminal, just stupid, and that some simple reprimand’s not a good enough charge, he wants expulsion. He then threw a party. This of course comes on the heels of Nancy Pelosi’s claiming that she had nothing to do with the ethics charges against Rangel or Waters. “Draining the swamp” only applies to conservatives obviously, duh.

Steven Slater then decided to pull the cord and use the chute.

H/T: K2

Also posted at Moonage Political Daydream.

Judge blocks furloughs in California

A judge has blocked the governor’s order of three furloughs per month, the latest effort to conserve the state’s dwindling funds until a new budget is approved.

Alameda County Superior Court Judge Steven Brick said there are “serious questions” connected to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s order last month, and temporarily halted the move until a Sept. 13 hearing. The judge said the furloughs could create irreparable harm to the 156,000 state employees who would lose three paid workdays — or almost 15 percent of their salary — under the order, which would save the cash-strapped state $150 million per month.

This judge came to the incredible epiphany that, oh sheez, this is so complicated I’m sure most everyone will have a very difficult time understanding it. But, I will do my utmost best to word it in such a way that it makes some sense. Alameda County Superior Court Judge Steven Brick came to the conclusion that paying people to work less causes them to not make as much money as they would have. I kid you not, he figured it out. I’m sure he had help since it took him over a year to come that conclusion. But he got it.
Read the rest of this entry

Is the 14th Amendment still needed?

United States Constitution

John Boehner says maybe not. What do you think?
Read the rest of this entry

Glenn Beck reads my stuff?

Right now Glenn Beck is waxing metaphorical how stop lights vs stop signs reflect the differences between conservative and liberal values. I did that a while back on my other blog. With my royalty check I’d just like a one week cruise in the Caribbean on the Island of the Seas. That’s all.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Every vote counts!

Think your vote doesn’t count? Look at this:
Read the rest of this entry

International Space Station loses its air conditioning

International Space Station
Read the rest of this entry

When the heavy lifting is over

7/22/2010: “Now that the heavy lifting is over, we can go out and make our case,”, Joe Biden. The legislative season is over. The big stuff is all done. No more contentious votes for a few months. Nancy Pelosi even went so far as to completely skip the funding process because of the incredible issue that this is an election year. Congress is now expedient.
Read the rest of this entry

Obama’s making history

We got the news that unemployment claims have risen this week. That’s in July. That’s as in traditionally one of the busiest months of the year. That puts Obama on a course of distinction:

President Avg Unemp
Obama 9.5
Ford 7.8
Reagan 7.5
Carter 6.5
GHW Bush 6.3
Kennedy 6.0
GW Bush 5.3
Clinton 5.2
Nixon 5.0
Eisenhower 4.9
Truman 4.2
Johnson 4.2

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Sarah Netter just doesn’t see irony very well

Sarah Netter, writing for ABC, sought insight for how the yet-to-be-enforced law in Arizona is causing racist attacks in Staten Island, New York.  So, she asked the president of National Council of La Raza. La Raza isn’t exactly a group advocating for the average white guy.  She pointed out how a Latino guy got beat up in New York.  She quoted another guy who pointed out there has been a spike in violence against Latinos in the last few years.  It’s just horrible.

The part she left out was the 25,000 Hispanic murders just across the border from Arizona that have nothing to do with the United States, racism, or SB 1070.  Maybe, and this is just a hypothetical, a lot of the violence in Staten Island could be the result of lifestyle choices and not the color of their skin.  Maybe, and this is just another hypothetical, the violence in Staten Island is completely and totally unrelated to the yet-to-be-enforced law in Arizona since, and I know this sounds crazy, THE LAW HAS NEVER BEEN ENFORCED.  Maybe, and this is the biggest leap I know, Sarah Netter had a conclusion she wanted to write about and had a very hard time finding anything to support it?

The only question I have about Sarah Netter’s article is did she come to her own conclusion first or did ABC tell her what her conclusion was before she wrote this to give the NAACP an assist on their equally vapid racist Tea Party statement?

Facebook deletes “real” Alex Jones page

Facebook has sensationally banned the official Alex Jones Facebook page after a customer services representative admitted that all material containing images of the famous Gadsden flag was being deleted by the social networking giant.

While some fan pages remain up,  the official Alex Jones Facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/realalexjones has been terminated. Other Alex Jones pages run by Infowars readers have also been deleted, such as the page that was formerly at http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Real-Alex-Jones

Culture of Corruption: felons prefer Al

Franken, that is.

It’s now come to light that apparently felons in Minnesota gave us Al Franken. Imagine that.

Nancy Pelosi has promised us that she will do everything in her power to diligently uphold the highest ethical standards in Congress that she possibly can and not allow HER Congress to return to the moral and ethical abyss that it was when she was in charge of it under a previous administration by dutifully doing nothing in regards to this information that a fellow member of her own party was possibly improperly elected.

When awoken with the news, Franken had no comment.

MSNBC, CBS, and CNN have rushed to assure none of their peeps comment either.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Cutting Corners is a very bad thing

The Senate passed the finance reform package. They’re sending it to Congress. It’ll pass. It’s 2,300 pages. It’s 390,000 words. When I asked a finance person what the impact would be on my personal bank, and my investments, he said “very little, if any”. Obama’s advice was a little more direct:

“Unless your business model depends on cutting corners or bilking your customers, you have nothing to fear.”

Who defines “cutting corners”?

Who defines “bilking”?
Read the rest of this entry

George Steinbrenner

George Steinbrenner just died at the age of 80.  The Obama administration was quick to point out it was due to a heart he inherited from a previous administration.  In the meantime, here are two of my favorite Steinbrenner moments:

And Larry David immortalized Steinbrenner for those who could care less about the Yankees:

Also posted at Moonage Webdream.

Tossing the Defense of Marriage Act

A federal judge in Massachusetts tossed out the federal Defense of Marriage Act. His logic, get this, is it encroaches on states. Here’s Federal Judge Joseph Tauro’s Ruling On DOMA:

Now, this is where being conservative gets fun for me.  I’m with Judge Tauro 100%.  First, let’s clear the air a litte bit:
Read the rest of this entry

Who’s Gonna Win the Border War?

West Virginia and the party that hates coal

1943.

There was no Super Bowl.  There was no BCS.  There was no FIFA.  There were no Civil Rights Acts. For that matter, there weren’t even 50 states. The world was at war. Israel didn’t exist. Everything ran on coal.

That was also the last time West Virginia elected a Republican Senator in a regular election.
Read the rest of this entry

Obama sues Arizona

As expected, the United States Department of Justice is apparently filing suit againt the state of Arizona over its immigrant law. Apparently Eric Holder will be running with a pre-emptive supremacy clause. The way I understand it is Holder will be arguing that federal law trumps state law.

And it does.

And Holder will lose.
Read the rest of this entry

Allah destroys infidel planet

Charles Bolden took bold new steps in pushing NASA in its new direction today.

infidel planet

What was discussing the hottest known planet in the universe will now simply be referred to as an infidel planet being destroyed per Allah’s will.

Or, moreso Barack Obama and Charlie Bolden’s will.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Byrd and Thurmond, only Adam Clymer can tell them apart

Strom Thurmond, Foe of Integration, Dies at 100

And:

Robert C. Byrd, a Pillar of the Senate, Dies at 92

Both opposed civil rights initially. Both converted to support civil rights. One was an outspoken member of the Ku Klux Klan. One was not. Wanna guess which was which?

Oh, and one died a Democrat, the other not.

Both obits were written by Adam Clymer for The New York Times. Guess we know where his priorities are. Objective news not being too high on his list apparently.

Hat tip to Doug Powers at MichelleMalkin.com.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

NASA’s new mission ( you’re not gonna believe this one! )

A few months ago, President Obama gutted NASA. People threw a fit. In order to get his health care reform passed, Obama cut a deal. Charles Bolden was the man to get it done. Quite confident in NASA’s lack of direction, Charles Bolden was now in charge of Obama’s newest direction. They were going to build the next generation module, with no rocket to carry it. In other words, NASA’s five year mission became to boldly go nowhere.
Read the rest of this entry

Unemployment: That great economy builder

Let’s start with a quiz:

If you guessed “Unemployment”, you’re on an intellectual level everyone in the United States aspires to be.  You’re right there with Nancy Pelosi.
Read the rest of this entry

Obama’s speech on immigration

Obama just gave a speech on immigration.  I was told it was coming.  He had totally lost the leadership role on the issue and needed to get it back.  So, expect a speech.  Well, we just got it.  He spoke at length on the merits of legal immigrants.  People who moved to the US and made the US a better place, their lives better, and the entire world.  He spoke of the huddled masses who work their fingers to the bone 20 hours every day so their poor but honest children can have a better life.  He spoke of the horrible people trying to take all that away.

What he never mentioned was the drug trafficking, the human trafficking, the murders, the violence, and other stuff that’s gotten so bad his own Homeland Security people decided to put up signs:

Border Sign

The first word on the sign, in big letters, says “DANGER”.  Obama never mentioned the signs.
Read the rest of this entry

Pete Stark, who ya gonna kill today?

I’ve written about Pete Stark here before. He’s ineffective and nuts. However, every time I’ve written about socialists in the House of Representatives, his name pops up. This is where Pete Stark calls home:
Read the rest of this entry

Joe Biden endorses Jim Yarmouth

Joe Biden, fresh on cussing out a custard man, came to Kentucky to endorse Jim Yarmouth.  Only problem, it’s John Yarmouth:

Along the way, he’s taking credit for creating 800 new jobs at GE over the next two years, hopefully.

That’s wonderful considering GE has cut 19,000 jobs over the last two decades.

However, given the GE CEO passed out from too much heat, at a GE plant, they might want to re-focus that push on washers and dryers and shoot for better air conditioning. But then again, how often do they have to compete with Joe Biden?

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed

Wanna guess where this line is quoted from?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto?

Mao Tse Teng?

Hitler?

The Khmer Rouge?

Hannibal?

Caligula?

Keep guessing.

Apparently a lot of people don’t know.

I’d include in that list John Paul Stephens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and of course, Sonia Sotomayor.
Read the rest of this entry

Someone throw Biden under the bus, please?

This guy is one heartbeat from the presidency.

I still to this day think Obama keeps him there to assure his own safety.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Something nice about Senator Robert Byrd

In the life of a politician, there is one day when everyone is obligated to say something nice about them.  For Senator Robert Byrd, today is that day.  I have never been a fan of Robert Byrd.  He did a lot of things a conservative would cringe about.  Lots.  But, today is that day.  He did one thing I always did like, a LOT.  To me, the biggest problem the federal government has, and this comes from experience working with it, is that almost the entire “mind” of the feds is within the beltway in Washington, DC.  Once otherwise knowing and learned people go inside the beltway, they suddenly become stupid.  Not in a low IQ kinda way, but in a common sense kind of way.  No longer does the rest of the Unites States really matter, it’s whatever makes sense within the beltway.  Tossing local issues at a person within the beltway often leads to nothing but confusion until you adapt whatever it is you’re wanting to do to beltway logic.  Don’t argue within someone inside the beltway over things that don’t exist there, you will lose.  They’re not going anywhere.  Once they leave the beltway at the end of the day, I think they suddenly become human again.  Senator Robert Byrd, for reasons I’m not terribly sure of, decided the FBI needed to be in West Virginia.  It was a huge joke at the time.  But, I liked the idea.  In this day of instant communication, we don’t need to have the entire federal government in Washington, DC.  In fact, for the good of the government, I think we need to move them out of the swamp.  Move the entire FBI headquarters to West Virginia.  We’ll take the CIA here.  Health and Human Services NEEDS to be North Dakota in the worst possible way.  Homeland Security NEEDS to be in southern Arizona in the worst possible way as well.  The Department of Labor needs to be in Mexico City apparently.

Senator Byrd got that part right.  To his detriment, he dropped the ball when we needed it most.  I really do think if these agencies were operating in places a little more open to fresh air ( and general public scrutiny ), we would have all the lunacy coming out of DC we do now.

So, in his honor, I think we need to start demanding that DC be de-centralized and the swamp returned to it’s original state in order to combat global warming.

Obama and that pesky transparency promise

Obama made transparency a big deal when he was running. The assumption was Bush was making all these backroom deals. I don’t think he was. Call it a hunch. So, Obama, pandering to the masses, promised to tell them everything. That has led to an odd result. First there was Nancy Pelosi’s well informed pitch to pass health care reform legislation:

But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.”

Pelosi’s so proud of that statement she’s got it on her website.
Read the rest of this entry

When the feds boycott you

Man, this is WRONG.  The US Department of Education and the US Border Patrol have cancelled events in Arizona.  This is the heart of being a Constitutionalist or not.  The Founding Fathers created a federal government ONLY because they knew the smaller individual states could not protect themselves against the British and French.  However, not trusting a large federal government, that was the only obligation the United States of America was given. 
Read the rest of this entry

Flying drones to make sure illegals get paid fairly?

This is indicative of the complete chaos coming out of the Obama administration at this time. And, given liberal philosophy, it won’t stop.

The Obama Department of Labor just spent your money to put together an advertising campaign letting illegal workers know they have rights to minimum wage standards. In Spanish.

They don’t have one in French. Guess Ms. Solis isn’t too worried about French Canadians being taken advantage of. That could never, ever, ever, be considered racial profiling would it?
Read the rest of this entry

Throwing Petraeus under the Moveon bus

This is precious.

I displayed my prophecy skills adeptly a couple of days ago in predicting General McChrystal’s departure. OK, the whole country did too. What I don’t think too many people did was predict the replacement. Here’s a discussion Obama had with Petraeus in 2007:

Read the rest of this entry

Obama changes M3 and housing

Two interesting charts. Two interesting facts.

US M3 money supply - Obama

That is how the M3 Money Supply has fared under Obama. Pretty brutal huh? I’m sure Obama has a whole slew of network talking heads and Cabinet members lined up to blame it on Bush. But, the second chart to me is even more interesting:
Read the rest of this entry

Throwing McChrystal under the bus

I’m not going to spend much time or effort on this one.

Obama has to fire McChrystal.  McChrystal left him no other option.  McChrystal did it on purpose.  Obama was totally ignoring him, totally ignoring the war, and putting his men in harm’s way for no real purpose.  He had no choice but to call out Obama.

McChrystal was a fool for accepting the position in the first place knowing how anti-military Obama was.

That’s it.

Passing on the most basic responsibility of governing

Steny Hoyer has decided Congress doesn’t need to pass a budget this year. It’s just too darned complicated to pass a budget when there’s all that darned debt. Rather than being faced with the possibility of increasing the debt even more, or making painful budget cuts during an election year, Hoyer is punting until later when there’s not an election to worry about.

I thought this comment was amazingly appropriate:

House Democrats are now on the cusp of failing to meet the most basic responsibility of governing – enacting a budget. The truth is, the American people are not the only ones who are rejecting the Democrats Party’s policies – so are some Democrats. After years of helping their party and president dig a massive fiscal hole, some Democrats are now running scared that their misguided policies will finally catch up to them at the ballot box this November.

Those words were spoken by Steny Hoyer in 2006. I changed one word. Wanna guess which one?

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Germany thinks we need to save money

Right as Obama is gearing up for another round of stimulus funding, Germany’s Angela Merkel blindsided him some of the craziest advice Obama’s probably heard since the last Tea Party rally:

“It’s urgently necessary for monetary stability that public budgets return to balance,” German Economy Minister Rainer Bruederle said at a press conference Monday, according to Bloomberg News. “This is something we should also tell our American friends.”

It was immediately repeated by the German Chancellor. Now, before delving too deeply into the how’s and why’s of why Germans suddenly feel compelled to quit spending money we don’t have like drunken sailors, one pic that I enjoy:

bush, beer, babes

Obama’s response will be that this is Bush’s fault.
Read the rest of this entry

Empowering the mentally challenged whether they want it or not

Fellow blogger Rudolph Carrera touched on a topic that’s close to me.   I have worked with the elderly for twenty years.  I have specifically worked with homebound indigent elderly for eighteen of those years.  Over those years we’ve had to deal with one “initiative” after another.  In very short time each one exposed weaknesses that eventually pushed its funding back to where it was in the first place.  Now, as Rudolph points out, they’re cutting funding to the people that need it most.  The indigent elderly are often abandoned by their families, if they even have one.  They are very often suffering from either the onset of, or the full symptoms of Alzheimers.  And, they are most likely unknowledgeable in how their governments work.  And, what makes them most vulnerable of all is their services are most often provided by very small organizations that are very often non-profits and charitable organizations.  In other words, they don’t have the lobbying cash the doctor’s associations do.  Although everyone is supposed to take a hit with the Medicaid cuts, the doctors are lobbying hard to get their cuts funded.  And, in Kentucky, and I imagine most other states, theyr’e getting support from the governors.  In our case, and I imagine most states, the Area Agencies on Aging aren’t even being mentioned as the governors lobby Congress.
Read the rest of this entry

Obama’s EPA Approved candle

Hey all.  I’m, glad to be here.  I don’t normally post an awful lot.  I’ll kick it off with an observation that I think is the perfect example of what exactly Obama has in mind for our future.  I stumbled across this on a clandestine mission a few days ago:

Obama's EPA approved candle

Not to be confused with a jar of blood, it’s a candle. It’s wax. It’s only wax. There is no wick. It does not burn. It does not emit light. It is a zero-carbon footprint candle. Now, I was assured this was most likely a screwed up attempt at a real candle, but I know better. I’m much too fast to pass that test. This is some company’s shot at the federal candle market. It fits perfectly into the EPA’s new no-carbon standards. Now, although I have no factory, I will offer anyone who wishes to have the Obama EPA approved candle for $19.99. Sure, it’s a little pricey for a candle, but in order to meet EPA’s new no-carbon standards, extra effort has to be made to remove the wick. Not sure how much shipping and handling will be as I’m not sure any shippers can meet the new no-carbon standards yet. But, somehow, for some cost, I will get it to you. Promise. I’ll bill you for whatever I want to charge after you get it.

Originally posted at my blog.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 324 other followers