Category Archives: Ethics

We’re Unready; the Biologists Are Bringing Change Anyway…

Religion Thrives With Freedom

Green Swamp of Corruption, Illustrated…

Contradictions: Do They Exist In Your Thinking?

The Perils of Altruism

CIA Expands Into Industrialized Assassination

Want to See Atheist Relative Morality in Action?

Brother, Can You Spare a Job?

TOP OBAMA DONORS GET PERKS AND PLUM GOVERNMENT POSITIONS

Telecom’s Donald H. Gips raised more than $500,000 to help finance his friend Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. Following the election, Gips was the man in charge of hiring in the Obama White House, placing loyalists and fundraisers in many key positions.
Read the rest of this entry

Should Conservatives Take the Low Road?

Palin Email Witch Hunt Backfires! OHH NOOO!!!

THE LEFT’S PATHETIC OBSESSION WITH SARAH PALIN IS HYSTERICAL 

Pity the poor “mainstream” media – or the Obama Media Group, as I like to call it. First it was Sarah Palin’s bus tour, and her in-your-face refusal to afford the indignant liberal press the respect they demand of her – as if they deserve it, given the way they have skewered her and her family, including her Down Syndrome son, Trig.

The Obama Media Group’s latest attempt at “gotcha” with Palin has blown up in their sniveling little faces as well. They just can’t seem to win with the imbecile from Wasilla anymore, can they? What are they to do?

This kind of treatment by Sarah Palin is more than the arrogant media can bear. What a terrible meanie she has become. Read the rest of this entry

It Smells Fishy

Malevolence vs. Benevolence

Freedom Maintenance Check

OBAMA MEDIA GROUP: THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING

Goldman-Sachs Director Sued by SEC

Whoops! Somehow, I don’t doubt the connection…

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-01/ex-goldman-sachs-director-rajat-gupta-tipped-off-raj-rajaratnam-sec-says.html

Chickensh*t Child-Killer Flees Country

The Reality of Congress

Let’s put the spending issue into perspective.  Say I am a conservative, thinking good fiscal sense is the right path.  My congressman (woman) may well be of like mind. Let’s say I support a high-speed rail system running through my city. Sure, data shows it would improve the economy and, perhaps environmental concerns, in my area. Yet, my congressperson says to me, “hey, it’s a great idea, but we simply cannot afford it at this time; let’s leave it on the table for another time”…

In the meantime, other, Democrat-controlled regions put forth similar plans, regardless of finances…

At the end of the day, the fiscally-irresponsible areas HAVE the expensive programs, at the increased expense of neighboring taxpayers, and the responsible parties (those who chose to wait) suffer because their time may never come, simply because they must now pay for the “greed” of neighboring districts and their default…

So, with this in mind… let me ask you this… Why should anyone ever wait? Republicans and Democrats are simply in a race to get whatever they can WHEN they can!

As long as ANY party chooses to spend more than they have, NO party can possibly act responsibly and hope to serve its constituents honorably, can it?

We must be making an impact here…

As I was coming here to post, I typed in constitutionclub with an erroneous .com, as my fingers are sometimes faster than my well-worn brain grooves.  For my error, I was redirected to a particularly offensive website – NAMBLA’s.

Not that I recommend you repeat my error, LOL
Read the rest of this entry

Hell hath frozen over – and we have lived to see it.

Can it be true? Is this just a vicious internet rumor?

Has Olbermann really been suspended without pay?  I suppose the real question is – has anyone noticed?

Moveon gets stomped on

A lot has been made of the video where a woman gets her head stomped on at a Rand Paul/Jack Conway debate.

A lot.  Before rushing to judgment, and before making incendiary comments in my presence, take into consideration some facts first.

Her original story was she was simply handing Rand Paul an employee of the month award for a fictional company moveon.org made up.  What is that supposed to mean to Rand Paul?  Then, it was she was simply wanting to hold a sign.  In all her versions, she’s just innocently standing there and gets jumped.  That’s Keith Olbermann’s take too.  Here’s the same incident from a different angle:

And here’s a slightly different angle too:

So, ya gotta ask yourself, if you could care less about knowing the truth, what a woman from Massachusetts, who works for a group that funds the opposing party against Rand Paul, was doing standing in the middle of a Rand Paul crowd and attacking his car?  I mean, last I recall, people in Massachusetts aren’t allowed to vote for Kentucky candidates.  So, this paid political activist wearing a wig and a hoodie then attacks Paul’s car and is taken down by two guys, one of whom restrains her with her foot.

She was wanting to create a scene.  And she did.  And Keith Olbermann was more than ready to feed it to the masses.  She’ll now go back to Massachusetts and plot her next political ploy I’m sure.

Doubt me still?  After the event Ilyse Hogue informs the media that Valle was in the hospital receiving treatment and wasn’t sure when she would be able to talk to the media.  At the same time, Valle is still at the event smiling and giving interviews for the media.  Why should anyone care?  Ilyse Hogue is moveon.org’s political director.  She’s lying too.  She’s not from Kentucky either.

All you peeps who immediately condemned the Rand Paul peeps have been lied to and taken for a ride.  You have been fooled.  That’s what moveon.org does.  This ain’t Greenpeace or some environmental activist group, this is Moveon.org., a purely political entity that supports Democrats any way they see fit and have been primarily funded by George Soros, a Hungarian who made his money in Russia and nearly destroyed the British economy.

That’s a whole lot of people that have nothing to do with Kentucky that are making an awful big scene trying to affect who we in Kentucky elect.  That’s just not right either.

The rebel in me wants to say that when pushy people come down from the North to try and tell us what to do, they might get their heads stomped on.  But, God knows that is so horribly politically incorrect so I probably shouldn’t say it that way.

But……

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Paul Krugman is still an idiot

Some people are just unlearned.  Some people are just stubborn.  Some people are just stupid.  Some people just can’t quit lying.  Paul Krugman has to be the latter.  His argument for why we should still vote Democrat in spite of the fact their economic policies to date have failed miserably is because we shouldn’t return to the prosperity that got us into this mess.  Yeah, you heard me right.  In spite of all the force-fed propaganda, what Paul Krugman et al are telling you are lies that they know, or would have to know, are lies.  Paul Krugman was there in 1999 and 2000.  I bet when he’s drunk out of his mind he still laughs about the “Dot-com bubble” that burst and sent the country into a perilous not-quite recession but pretty bad economic mess.  For those of us who are not Princeton educated economists, we have to read Wikipedia to remind ourselves of it.  Heck, Wiki even has a specific date it burst, March 10, 2000.  With the exploding markets, President Clinton’s Federal Reserve raised interest rates six times doing everything it could to suck the life out of the “irrational exuberance”.  BY March 10, 2000, they succeeded and the markets started receding, soon to be an all-out collapse.  Throughout 2000 the headlines were marked by huge dot-com successes filing for bankruptcy.  They in turn took out other industry giants such as communications and manufacturing.  The corporate graveyard was astounding in 2000.  Then, the NEXT YEAR, President Bush took office.  So, all this BS that things were so fantastic when Bush took office is just flat out lies. Krugman was there.  He knows what happened.  Is that what he thinks we need to return to?

Bush inherited a mess, and it only got worse.  Shortly after he took office, 9/11 occurred.  That created a mess on it’s own.  However, starting pretty much to that day, with the assist of the “Bush tax cuts for the wealthy”, the country kicked into one of the longest sustained growths in the country’s history.  It wasn’t crazy irrational growth, it was average, and steady.  There was no inflation, and unemployment stayed fairly steady.  In 2006 the country focused more on perceived personal misfortunes than the economy and voted the Republicans out of control.  Almost on cue, the economy tanked.  Now, Paul Krugman knows this.  He knows who controls the spending budgets.  He knows who controls the Fed rate policies.  He knows just as well as you and I do that when Nancy Pelosi’s economic policies started hitting the markets, they killed it.  Bush wasn’t the one who proposed TARP, he merely did not interfere with Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.  They wrote it, the Democrats passed it.  The economy tanked.  Then Obama got his shot at the whole mess.  It tanked even worse.

So, what Krugman is telling us is that we need to return to the days when  undocumented book values were taxed at outrageous levels regardless of whether they were real or not.  That successful people should be taxed at somewhere around 60%.  That the federal government should turn its head completely when companies make outrageous leaps in book value with no revenues to speak of.  That banks would leverage completely fictional values against revenues a company never had.  That home values would be allowed to explode for no apparent reason.  And, of course, that it’s the Republicans that are sold out to big business that allowed this to happen while the not-really-Communist Democrats are protecting the little union guy.

None of that makes sense.  No one calls Krugman on any of it.  So, him and the New York Times and most other media just keep on repeating it over and over to saturate the internet so it appears that it has to be real.

Apparently the average American voter just isn’t that stupid.  Do you remember 2000? Yes we can!  Do you remember 2007?  Yes we can!

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Over-protectionism, or… You really do need a passport to come down here.

Welcome to the deep south.  That’s right.  Where the hospitality flows and nothing is ever negative, it’s just ‘special’, or ‘lovely’.  (“What do you think of this?” … “Oh, isn’t that lovely, dear.”)

Being the parent of three extremely extroverted kids, I often find myself struggling with the idea of being over-protective.  Yes, that’s right, I’m the one who won’t let the kids go out and play in the street unsupervised even though my parents did it.  I’m the one who makes sure that they are strapped into the all but bulletproof car seats in the safest cars with the bulletproof glass and tinted windows.  I’m the one who won’t let the kids get into the back of the truck to ride down to the pond even though I recall falling out of the truck several times as a kid.  (“Mom, I fell out of granddad’s truck on the way to the pond. It hurt.”  “Oh, isn’t that lovely, dear?”)

Most days I endure the comments.  “Oh, I understand why you won’t let your kids come over to spend the night. It’s fine, no really.. it’s lovely.”

Then there are days where I come to work and my colleague says “hey did you hear about..”, and suddenly I am justified.  Yes, welcome to the deep south, where rolling just isn’t how they roll anymore.

Read the rest of this entry

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

This is getting nuttier every day. In 1993, when the Democrats controlled everything in DC, they passed a piece of legislation that pretty much everyone hated. It was affectionately referred to as the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994“. Now, a lot of people don’t keep track of things like they should so I’ll remind everyone how the Senate voted:

Akaka (D-HI), Yea
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Bingaman (D-NM), Yea
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Boren (D-OK), Yea
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Bradley (D-NJ), Yea
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Brown (R-CO), Nay
Bryan (D-NV), Yea
Bumpers (D-AR), Yea
Burns (R-MT), Yea
Byrd (D-WV), Yea
Campbell (D-CO), Yea
Chafee (R-RI), Yea
Coats (R-IN), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Cohen (R-ME), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Coverdell (R-GA), Nay
Craig (R-ID), Yea
D’Amato (R-NY), Nay
Danforth (R-MO), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
DeConcini (D-AZ), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Yea

Dole (R-KS), Nay
Domenici (R-NM), Nay
Dorgan (D-ND), Not Voting
Durenberger (R-MN), Yea
Exon (D-NE), Yea
Faircloth (R-NC), Yea
Feingold (D-WI), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Ford (D-KY), Yea
Glenn (D-OH), Yea
Gorton (R-WA), Nay
Graham (D-FL), Yea
Gramm (R-TX), Nay
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Nay
Hatfield (R-OR), Nay
Heflin (D-AL), Yea
Helms (R-NC), Nay
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Yea
Jeffords (R-VT), Yea
Johnston (D-LA), Yea
Kassebaum (R-KS), Yea
Kempthorne (R-ID), Yea
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Kerrey (D-NE), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Yea
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Mack (R-FL), Nay
Mathews (D-TN), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Nay
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Metzenbaum (D-OH), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Mitchell (D-ME), Yea
Moseley-Braun (D-IL), Yea
Moynihan (D-NY), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Nay
Nunn (D-GA), Yea
Packwood (R-OR), Nay
Pell (D-RI), Yea
Pressler (R-SD), Nay
Pryor (D-AR), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Riegle (D-MI), Yea
Robb (D-VA), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Roth (R-DE), Nay
Sarbanes (D-MD), Yea
Sasser (D-TN), Yea
Shelby (D-AL), Yea
Simon (D-IL), Yea
Simpson (R-WY), Yea
Smith (R-NH), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Nay
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Thurmond (R-SC), Yea
Wallop (R-WY), Nay
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Nay
Wofford (D-PA), Yea

I hilite the “yea””s for a reason. Wannna guess what it is? OK, I’ll give one clue. Democrats passed this thing 51-12. Without one single Republican needing to vote, they passed it. The military didn’t like it, the gay community didn’t like it, no one liked it. The Democrat controlled House, the Democrat controlled Senate, and the Democrat President rammed it through anyway. According to Clinton, it wasn’t perfect, but it was a start. Media pretty much ignored “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” for a while until it became expedient. Over time, it became purely a Republican issue as the Republicans did exactly as the Democrats did years before and effectively ignored it. The media bias culminated itself this year when Lady Gaga chastised Republicans for talking about filibustering the bill that would eliminate Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell:
http://abcnews.go.com/assets/player/walt2.6/flash/SFP_Walt.swf

“I will not stop calling until I reach them to tell them to vote with Sen. Harry Reid to end John McCain’s ‘shameless filibuster,’” she said.

She then calls two Democrats who refuse to take her call. There was no filibuster, Harry Reid never sent it to the floor. The gays returned to attacking the hell out of Republicans only even though the Democrats once again had all the votes they needed to pass the legislation to end it. All the while, no one was mentioning the fact that a lawsuit was working it’s way through the legal system to undo what Bill Clinton and the Democrats did in 1993. It wasn’t filed by Lady Gaga. It wasn’t filed by any Democrat. It was filed by the Log Cabin Republicans. And then a weird thing happened. They won. Republicans, who controlled nothing in DC, did what Harry Reid refused to do. They ended “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. The Obama administration thought about it for a couple of days. And, knowing how the gays felt about DADT, had this to offer:

WASHINGTON — After two days of silence, the Obama administration urged a federal judge on Thursday to let the military press on with its “don’t ask, don’t tell” ban on gays serving openly in the military. Still, President Barack Obama insisted the policy that has divided the nation for two decades “will end on my watch.”

The Pentagon said the military “will of course obey the law” and halt enforcement while the case is still in question. But gay rights advocates cautioned gay service members to avoid revealing their sexuality in the meantime.

A federal judge abruptly threw out the Clinton-era ban on Tuesday, setting in motion a legal, political and human-rights back-and-forth that put the administration on the spot just two weeks before crucial midterm elections. Obama has consistently argued against the ban, approved by Congress in 1993. But he says it is up to Congress to repeal it.

The policy, summed up as “don’t ask, don’t tell,” refers to guidance that gay or lesbian Americans can serve in the military but not openly. Their superiors are forbidden to ask about sexual orientation, but service members can be thrown out or denied enlistment if they talk about being gay or let it be known that they engage in homosexual acts.

Obama’s Justice Department asked U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips to stay her ruling that overturned the ban while the government prepares a formal appeal. Asking the judge for a response by Monday – “given the urgency and gravity of the issues” – the government said that suddenly ending the ban would be disruptive and “irreparably harm the public interest in a strong and effective military.”

Obama, challenged Thursday at a town hall meeting by a Howard University faculty member who questioned his “alleged commitment to equality for all Americans, gay and straight,” said his stance has not wavered. He can’t end the ban with the stroke of a pen, he said, but “we’re going to end this policy.”

You read that right. The Obama Administration is asking for a delay in the ruling so the Obama Administration can prepare an appeal to the ruling. They wanna fight it. So, even though the Democrats wrote DADT, passed DADT, have ruled over DADT for nine of the seventeen years it’s been existance, refused to vote to end DADT, and now are fighting legally to keep DADT, I bet you good money there won’t be a single liberal gay person come out and point their finger where the problem is, has been, and continues to be. If they do, I’d love to see their comments here. The reason DADT has survived all these years considering no one seems to like it is because the Democrats know they won’t be held accountable for it so no need to antagonize their moderate to conservative base, and the Republicans know that no matter what they do they won’t get any credit so they have no reason to antagonize their base either. When media and gays become less partisan and more objective then maybe they’ll get what they want.

Until then, they’ll have to keep relying on the Republicans. It’s a core issue with Republicans in a way most people don’t really think about. In expecting the government to protect a minority, the government has to do it in a way that is equitable to all people affected by the minority. Sometimes that doesn’t necessarily work to the minority’s advantage. By NOT recognizing the minority as a minority, it removes the issue of being a minority and allows the issues that affect that minority to be addressed. There is no reason to protect gays in the military. They are already protected by our Constitution. What needs to be protected are the rights gays have as US citizens. When that occurs, gays will have all the same rights as anyone else in the military and I am quite sure that would make everyone happy. Repealing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell therefore is kind of moot to me. What needs to happen is all references to discriminating on the basis of sexual preferance need to be eliminated. I really don’t buy the argument that it would be disruptive to the military at all. Obama may want you to believe that, but I don’t.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Ben Chandler hammers Andy Barr’s criminal record

The Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee is hammering Andy Barr in Kentucky about as hard as you can:

You can’t trust Andy Barr for anything because he’s a criminal. Simple message. According to Bluegrass Politics it’s true too:

The ruling: True.

The facts: In 1993, as a 19-year-old college student vacationing in Key West, Fla., Barr was charged by police with possession of a fake Mississippi driver’s license. He pleaded guilty and was ordered to provide eight hours of community service, according to court records.

Their justification of why it’s true is that when he applied for state jobs he didn’t list that conviction. He felt it was “minor”. DCCC argues otherwise.

I think this is deceptive by Ben Chandler and the DCCC. What do you think?

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Whoopi on civility?

Whoopi Goldberg is now trying to make money bemoaning the loss of civility.

I kid you not.

She has written an entire book about it. Seriously, she has.

This of course came out right about the time she was telling basically everyone who had an opinion about the 9/11 Mosque to kiss her butt. And of course, her daily civil discourse usually sounds something like this:

Just a couple of suggestions on civility here would do. Firsties, don’t talk over people. Secondies, don’t interrupt others. Thirdly, comparing modern people to historic despots isn’t civil. Fourthly, lying about others isn’t civil either ( some would call it slander ).

I really think when she sets the bar a little higher she’ll have room to complain about others. Until then, just send me your $12.49. It’ll do a little more good for mankind than her hypocritical book.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

PS: Sorry so lazy lately, I had to take a sudden ocean cruise to Mexico for a week or so.

Constitutionality, Christianity, Progressivism And The Captive Poor

I wrote this in an email the other day and everyone told me to publish it, so here it is with very minimal editing.

We, the people, must recognize that our two major parties have been co-opted at their highest levels. They no longer prove themselves to support the Constitution. Instead they advance agendas that should deeply concern anyone who understands what our constitution says and why.

John Adams once said, “Our constitution is only fit for a moral and religious people. It is wholly unsuited to the governance of any other kind” because the Constitution contained no controls over those who would reject morality and decency in favor of hedonism and self-indulgence. It also contains no controls, talis qualis, that are, or ever would be, strong enough to defeat progressivism which seeks to ignore it (or for that matter Sharia law which would supplant it). Only the vigilance of a stubborn and well-informed citizenry can do that!
Read the rest of this entry

Sex Education, Social Engineering, Progressive Politics And The Rainbow Agenda

I personally home schooled my daughter through 7th grade and my son through 6th. She is positioned to be the valedictorian of her school next year and hopes to go into law or medicine. As an 11th grader, she claims to be the ONLY virgin she knows of in her entire high school (of over 1000 students). Her 8th grade brother is an honor student taking both regular and advanced classes despite profound dyslexia. He, too, is proud to be a virgin. Referring to his classmates, he says “most of them” are sexually active. What difference did an abstinence-based (home schooling) curriculum make in their lives? I believe it made all the difference! By far the best place to give children a healthy understanding of the proper role of sex in their lives is in their own homes.
Read the rest of this entry

Helena Sex Ed Curriculum (barely) Revised…

Helena, MT (ConClub) – The Helena School District’s feeble attempts to quell widespread public opposition to teaching a gay activist/liberal/progressive sex-ed program beginning in kindergarten and including homosexuality from the outset, represent too little in the way of real, substantive change. Thus, they have categorically failed to impress what turned out to be a small army of local critics here. A well attended meeting hosted by Helena Youth Advocates (HYA), a grassroots organization comprised largely of concerned parents was held at the Public Library this evening. As well as vocal parents, it appeared to include opposition activists, politicians and even one teacher (who wishes to remain anonymous for obvious reasons).
Read the rest of this entry

Whatever happened to the Summer of Recovery

Heh! Trick question of course. It was never meant for you if you weren’t a construction project:

“The vice president was talking about the summer of recovery in reference to the Recovery Act, that you would see the creation of a series of infrastructure and other projects ramping up over the summer,” Goolsbee said on “Fox News Sunday.” “And you did see that.”

Raise your hand out there, how many of you thought Joe Biden was promising jobs?

Maybe a little more looking is warranted:
Read the rest of this entry

When the heavy lifting is over

7/22/2010: “Now that the heavy lifting is over, we can go out and make our case,”, Joe Biden. The legislative season is over. The big stuff is all done. No more contentious votes for a few months. Nancy Pelosi even went so far as to completely skip the funding process because of the incredible issue that this is an election year. Congress is now expedient.
Read the rest of this entry

Article Roundup for July 23, 2010

Catching up with my colleagues:

Friendly Fire on Capitol Hill – By Karl Rove, Wall Street Journal. – There is a small-scale civil war inside the Democratic Party. President Obama has himself to blame. Karl Rove analyzes the situation for the WSJ.
Read the rest of this entry

Culture of Corruption: felons prefer Al

Franken, that is.

It’s now come to light that apparently felons in Minnesota gave us Al Franken. Imagine that.

Nancy Pelosi has promised us that she will do everything in her power to diligently uphold the highest ethical standards in Congress that she possibly can and not allow HER Congress to return to the moral and ethical abyss that it was when she was in charge of it under a previous administration by dutifully doing nothing in regards to this information that a fellow member of her own party was possibly improperly elected.

When awoken with the news, Franken had no comment.

MSNBC, CBS, and CNN have rushed to assure none of their peeps comment either.

Originally posted at Moonage Political Webdream.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 324 other followers